The Great Storm struck the United Kingdom on 15–16 October 1987, bringing exceptionally strong winds and widespread damage. The Met Office’s historical account records the event’s meteorological context and the forecasting and warning experience associated with it. Its chronology helps explain why forecasts, public warnings and preparation matter when severe weather threatens.
The storm’s 15–16 October chronology
The Met Office records the Great Storm as an event spanning 15 and 16 October 1987. It was a major windstorm that affected parts of the United Kingdom, with fallen trees, damage to buildings and disruption among its broad impacts. The event became a landmark in British weather history because of the scale of its effects and the questions it raised about how forecasts are communicated.
The chronology matters: the storm developed and affected the country across two dates, rather than being a single instantaneous event. That distinction is useful when reading historical accounts, which may describe conditions, impacts and public response at different points in the event.
What the Met Office account says about forecasting
The storm is often remembered alongside concerns about forecasting and public warnings. The Met Office case study provides the meteorological context for the event and documents its place in the history of UK weather forecasting. For readers seeking the published network version, it offers another account of the storm. In retelling that history, it is important to distinguish the broad lesson from a simplified claim that nobody forecast the storm or that the public received no warning.
Forecasts describe the likely development of weather; warnings communicate potential impacts so people and organisations can act. A forecast can indicate severe conditions while uncertainty remains about timing, location or intensity. Warning systems and public communication help translate that evolving information into practical decisions.
The Great Storm’s legacy is therefore often connected with improvements in how severe weather is forecast and communicated. The Met Office chronology offers a historical reference point for those discussions, but a single event cannot by itself explain every later change in forecasting practice. Claims about specific warning wording, timing or public response should be checked against detailed historical records rather than inferred from the storm’s reputation.
How the storm affected people and places
Very strong winds can bring down trees, damage buildings and interrupt transport and other services. Those are the kinds of effects that made the October 1987 storm consequential well beyond the weather itself. The impact of a windstorm depends not only on wind strength but also on where the strongest conditions occur and what they encounter, including trees, buildings and infrastructure.

For people at the time, disruption could mean unsafe travel, blocked roads and damage to homes or property. For communities and public services, fallen trees and damaged infrastructure can create demands that continue after the strongest winds have passed. These impacts help explain why severe-weather advice focuses on actions before, during and after an event, not just the forecast headline.
Preparedness lessons that still make sense
The historical lesson is practical: take official forecasts and warnings seriously, and use current guidance to make decisions. People can reduce avoidable exposure by checking the latest information, allowing for travel disruption and securing loose outdoor items when strong winds are forecast.
When an active warning is issued, follow the advice for its area and impact, and check for updates as conditions change. Keep in mind that local conditions can differ: a broad forecast does not mean every place will experience the same impacts. Preparedness is most useful when it is based on current, location-specific information.
What the 1987 storm cannot tell us about today
The Great Storm is historical context, not a forecast for this October or any other date. Its occurrence does not show that a similar storm is imminent, and it is not a direct measure of present-day climate risk. Assessing current risk requires contemporary observations, forecasts and suitable long-term climate evidence, not a simple comparison with one historic event.
The next relevant check for anyone concerned about current conditions is the Met Office’s latest forecast and warnings for their location. The record of 15–16 October 1987 explains why that information matters; only current updates can describe the weather risk now.
Source: Met Office
Context & actions About this article
Source check Historical context
The historical account is based on the Met Office case study of the storm of 15–16 October 1987.
- The Met Office dates the case study to 15–16 October 1987.
- The storm is presented as historical context, not a current forecast.
- Current weather decisions should use the latest local forecast and warnings.
- Source
- Met Office
- Scope
- United Kingdom
- Updated
- 2026-10-22 07:55
Source check
Report a trust issue
Send a clear signal to community moderation if the source, facts or context need review.
Comments